diff --git a/backend/internal/handler/grok_media.go b/backend/internal/handler/grok_media.go
index 7f38fc10b..0522d689b 100644
--- a/backend/internal/handler/grok_media.go
+++ b/backend/internal/handler/grok_media.go
@@ -472,8 +472,11 @@ func recordGrokMediaUsage(
 	inboundEndpoint := GetInboundEndpoint(c)
 	upstreamEndpoint := GetUpstreamEndpoint(c, account.Platform)
 	quotaPlatform := service.QuotaPlatform(c.Request.Context(), apiKey)
+	// OriginalModel 记录客户端请求的模型：composite 分组下 body 已被改写为具体模型，
+	// 公开别名需从 context 取回，与其他端点的用量归因口径一致（计费不受影响：
+	// BillingModelSource 为空不会触发来源覆盖）。
 	channelUsageFields := service.ChannelUsageFields{
-		OriginalModel:      requestModel,
+		OriginalModel:      clientRequestedModel(c, requestModel),
 		ChannelMappedModel: requestModel,
 	}
 	h.submitOpenAIUsageRecordTask(c.Request.Context(), result, func(ctx context.Context) {
diff --git a/backend/internal/service/gateway_usage_billing.go b/backend/internal/service/gateway_usage_billing.go
index 1aa156f2e..1606f0f3c 100644
--- a/backend/internal/service/gateway_usage_billing.go
+++ b/backend/internal/service/gateway_usage_billing.go
@@ -683,13 +683,24 @@ func (s *GatewayService) recordUsageCore(ctx context.Context, input *recordUsage
 	multiplier, imageMultiplier := computePeakAwareMultipliers(apiKey, multiplier, timezone.Now())
 
 	// 确定计费模型
-	billingModel := forwardResultBillingModel(result.Model, result.UpstreamModel)
+	concreteBillingModel := forwardResultBillingModel(result.Model, result.UpstreamModel)
+	billingModel := concreteBillingModel
 	if input.BillingModelSource == BillingModelSourceChannelMapped && input.ChannelMappedModel != "" {
 		billingModel = input.ChannelMappedModel
 	}
 	if input.BillingModelSource == BillingModelSourceRequested && input.OriginalModel != "" {
 		billingModel = input.OriginalModel
 	}
+	// composite 分组的公开别名（如 all/claude）会经 OriginalModel/ChannelMappedModel
+	// 进入上面的来源覆盖：任意别名查无价会静默落 $0，含家族词的别名则被价格表的
+	// 家族模糊匹配错计（如 Opus 流量按 Sonnet 兜底价）。除非管理员为别名显式配置了
+	// 渠道定价（OpenRouter 式自定价），composite 请求一律按实际转发的具体模型计费。
+	if apiKey.Group != nil && apiKey.Group.Platform == PlatformComposite {
+		billingModel = s.compositeBillableModel(ctx, apiKey, billingModel, concreteBillingModel)
+	}
+	// 通用兜底（与 OpenAI 路径的 usageBillingModelCandidates 语义对齐）：
+	// 选定模型查不到任何价格时回退到实际转发的具体模型。已定价流量不受影响。
+	billingModel = s.billableModelWithFallback(ctx, apiKey, billingModel, result.UpstreamModel, result.Model)
 
 	// 确定 RequestedModel（渠道映射前的原始模型）
 	requestedModel := result.Model
@@ -790,6 +801,56 @@ func (s *GatewayService) calculateRecordUsageCost(
 	return s.calculateTokenCost(ctx, result, apiKey, billingModel, multiplier, opts)
 }
 
+// compositeBillableModel 决定 composite 分组请求的计费模型：来源覆盖把计费模型
+// 换成公开别名等非具体模型时，只有管理员为该名字显式配置了渠道定价才按其计费
+// （OpenRouter 式自定价），否则回退到实际转发的具体模型，避免别名落入价格表的
+// 家族模糊匹配（错价）或查无价（$0）。未发生来源覆盖时原样返回。
+func (s *GatewayService) compositeBillableModel(ctx context.Context, apiKey *APIKey, billingModel, concreteBillingModel string) string {
+	if concreteBillingModel == "" || billingModel == concreteBillingModel {
+		return billingModel
+	}
+	if s.resolveChannelPricing(ctx, billingModel, apiKey) != nil {
+		return billingModel
+	}
+	logger.LegacyPrintf("service.gateway", "[Billing] composite billing model %q has no explicit channel pricing, billing by concrete model %q", billingModel, concreteBillingModel)
+	return concreteBillingModel
+}
+
+// billableModelWithFallback 在选定计费模型（可能是 composite 公开别名或未定价的映射名）
+// 查不到任何价格（渠道价与全局价均无）时，按序回退到实际转发的具体模型，避免静默 $0 计费。
+// 所有候选都无价时保持原值，走既有的 warn + 零成本路径。
+func (s *GatewayService) billableModelWithFallback(ctx context.Context, apiKey *APIKey, billingModel string, fallbacks ...string) string {
+	if s.hasResolvableTokenPricing(ctx, billingModel, apiKey) {
+		return billingModel
+	}
+	for _, fallback := range fallbacks {
+		fallback = strings.TrimSpace(fallback)
+		if fallback == "" || fallback == billingModel {
+			continue
+		}
+		if s.hasResolvableTokenPricing(ctx, fallback, apiKey) {
+			logger.LegacyPrintf("service.gateway", "[Billing] billing model %q has no pricing, falling back to concrete model %q", billingModel, fallback)
+			return fallback
+		}
+	}
+	return billingModel
+}
+
+// hasResolvableTokenPricing 判断模型是否能在渠道定价或全局价格表中解析出 token 价格。
+func (s *GatewayService) hasResolvableTokenPricing(ctx context.Context, model string, apiKey *APIKey) bool {
+	if strings.TrimSpace(model) == "" {
+		return false
+	}
+	if s.resolveChannelPricing(ctx, model, apiKey) != nil {
+		return true
+	}
+	if s.billingService == nil {
+		return false
+	}
+	_, err := s.billingService.GetModelPricing(model)
+	return err == nil
+}
+
 // resolveChannelPricing 检查指定模型是否存在渠道级别定价。
 // 返回非 nil 的 ResolvedPricing 表示有渠道定价，nil 表示走默认定价路径。
 func (s *GatewayService) resolveChannelPricing(ctx context.Context, billingModel string, apiKey *APIKey) *ResolvedPricing {
diff --git a/backend/internal/service/gateway_usage_billing_fallback_test.go b/backend/internal/service/gateway_usage_billing_fallback_test.go
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ecf321859
--- /dev/null
+++ b/backend/internal/service/gateway_usage_billing_fallback_test.go
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+//go:build unit
+
+package service
+
+import (
+	"context"
+	"testing"
+
+	"github.com/Wei-Shaw/sub2api/internal/config"
+
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
+)
+
+// composite 分组的公开别名经 BillingModelSource 来源覆盖成为计费模型后有两类错计：
+// 任意别名（如 team/best）查无价静默落 $0；含家族词的别名（如 all/claude）被价格表
+// 家族模糊匹配错计（Opus 流量按 Sonnet 兜底价）。compositeBillableModel 要求别名必须
+// 有显式渠道定价才可参与计费，否则回退实际转发的具体模型。
+func TestCompositeBillableModel(t *testing.T) {
+	svc := &GatewayService{billingService: NewBillingService(&config.Config{}, nil)}
+	apiKey := &APIKey{}
+	ctx := context.Background()
+
+	// 别名无渠道定价（含家族词也一样）→ 回退具体模型
+	require.Equal(t, "claude-opus-4-7",
+		svc.compositeBillableModel(ctx, apiKey, "all/claude", "claude-opus-4-7"))
+	require.Equal(t, "claude-sonnet-4",
+		svc.compositeBillableModel(ctx, apiKey, "team/best", "claude-sonnet-4"))
+
+	// 未发生来源覆盖（计费模型已是具体模型）→ 原样返回
+	require.Equal(t, "claude-sonnet-4",
+		svc.compositeBillableModel(ctx, apiKey, "claude-sonnet-4", "claude-sonnet-4"))
+
+	// 具体模型缺失 → 保持原值（走后续通用兜底/既有路径）
+	require.Equal(t, "all/claude",
+		svc.compositeBillableModel(ctx, apiKey, "all/claude", ""))
+}
+
+// billableModelWithFallback 是通用安全网：选定计费模型查不到任何价格时回退到
+// 实际转发的具体模型；已定价流量（含家族兜底可解析的名字）不受影响。
+func TestBillableModelWithFallback(t *testing.T) {
+	svc := &GatewayService{billingService: NewBillingService(&config.Config{}, nil)}
+	apiKey := &APIKey{}
+	ctx := context.Background()
+
+	// 完全无价的别名 → 回退到具体转发模型（claude-sonnet-4 有内置回退价格）
+	require.Equal(t, "claude-sonnet-4",
+		svc.billableModelWithFallback(ctx, apiKey, "team/best", "", "claude-sonnet-4"))
+
+	// 已定价模型不回退，候选被忽略
+	require.Equal(t, "claude-sonnet-4",
+		svc.billableModelWithFallback(ctx, apiKey, "claude-sonnet-4", "claude-opus-4"))
+
+	// 所有候选都无价 → 保持原值，走既有 warn + 零成本路径
+	require.Equal(t, "team/best",
+		svc.billableModelWithFallback(ctx, apiKey, "team/best", "another/alias", ""))
+
+	// 空计费模型 + 有价候选 → 取候选
+	require.Equal(t, "claude-sonnet-4",
+		svc.billableModelWithFallback(ctx, apiKey, "", "claude-sonnet-4"))
+}
+
+func TestHasResolvableTokenPricing(t *testing.T) {
+	svc := &GatewayService{billingService: NewBillingService(&config.Config{}, nil)}
+	apiKey := &APIKey{}
+	ctx := context.Background()
+
+	require.True(t, svc.hasResolvableTokenPricing(ctx, "claude-sonnet-4", apiKey))
+	// 注意：含家族词的名字（all/claude）会被价格表家族兜底解析为"有价"，
+	// 这正是 compositeBillableModel 必须先于通用兜底拦截别名的原因。
+	require.True(t, svc.hasResolvableTokenPricing(ctx, "all/claude", apiKey))
+	require.False(t, svc.hasResolvableTokenPricing(ctx, "team/best", apiKey))
+	require.False(t, svc.hasResolvableTokenPricing(ctx, "", apiKey))
+
+	// billingService 缺失时 fail-closed（不误判有价）
+	empty := &GatewayService{}
+	require.False(t, empty.hasResolvableTokenPricing(ctx, "claude-sonnet-4", apiKey))
+}