mirror of
https://github.com/wu736139669/hapi.git
synced 2026-10-31 23:31:39 +00:00
HeavyGeeandGitHub
dc0d21e05b
* fix(cursor): intercept fabricated 'Questions skipped' AskQuestion result in headless mode (#784) When cursor-agent runs under `--print --output-format stream-json` (HAPI's current Cursor remote launcher), the CLI returns a synthetic `Questions skipped by the user, continue with the information you already have` response for the `AskQuestion` tool in ~zero seconds with no error flag, because there is no IDE surface to render the question. The underlying model can interpret this as legitimate user consent and act on it. This patch intercepts the synthetic result in `cli/src/cursor/utils/cursorEventConverter.ts` and rewrites the `tool_call`/completed event to a structured `no_input_surface` failure (`status: 'failed'`, which downstream becomes `is_error: true`). Detection has two strategies: 1. String match - any `tool_call`/completed payload whose serialized form contains the synthetic-skip marker is rewritten. This is robust to wherever cursor-agent stuffs the marker inside the `tool_call` object. 2. Timing + name heuristic (defense in depth) - any completion that arrives within 500 ms of its 'started' event with a trivial result, for a tool call named `AskQuestion`, `askQuestion`, `ask_question`, or the converter's `unknown` fallback, is also rewritten. This catches the case where cursor-agent changes the synthetic-string text in a future release. The converter tracks per-call timestamps in a bounded `Map` (`<= 1024` entries, oldest evicted on overflow) and clears entries when the corresponding 'completed' event arrives. A small test-only reset hook isolates state between Vitest cases. This is a transitional safety patch. It auto-deletes when #781's ACP launcher replaces the stream-json launcher and `cursor/ask_question` becomes a proper bidirectional ACP method where fabrication is structurally impossible. Scope is intentionally tiny: only `cli/src/cursor/utils/cursorEventConverter.ts`, its colocated Vitest file, and a section in `docs/guide/cursor.md`. No changes to `cursorRemoteLauncher.ts`, ACP code, web normalizer, or permission UI. Refs: tiann/hapi#781 (long-term resolution via ACP migration) Closes: tiann/hapi#784 * fix(cursor): gate AskQuestion intercept on tool name (#784 PR #801 review) Address regression flagged by the HAPI auto-review bot on #801: `containsSyntheticSkipMarker` previously stringified the entire `tool_call` payload and matched the literal marker substring. Because this PR also adds that exact marker to `docs/guide/cursor.md` (to document the intercept), a Cursor `read_file` of that documentation page would surface the marker inside `readToolCall.result.content` and be rewritten as a `no_input_surface` failure, corrupting an unrelated, legitimate result. The intercept is now gated on the tool name resolving to an AskQuestion-shaped call (`AskQuestion`, `askQuestion`, `ask_question`, or the converter's `unknown` fallback for unnamed function-shaped tools). `read_file` / `write_file` tool calls - which have explicit `read_file` and `write_file` names from `extractToolName` - no longer fall under the intercept, regardless of what their payload contains. The marker check itself now walks values recursively (string / array / object), guarded by a `WeakSet` against cycles, instead of relying on `JSON.stringify`. Slightly tidier; behaviour is otherwise unchanged for the AskQuestion path. Regression tests added: - `read_file` result whose `content` contains the marker -> passes through with `status: 'completed'` and no `no_input_surface`. - `write_file` whose serialized `args` contain the marker -> same. - A non-AskQuestion function tool (`MyCustomTool`) whose result quotes the marker -> same. All 846 cli tests pass (17 in this file). `bun run typecheck` exits 0. * fix(cursor): scope synthetic-skip check to extracted result (#784 PR #801 review-2) Address second Major finding from the HAPI auto-review bot on #801: After the previous fix gated the intercept on the tool name, the marker check still recursed into the entire `tool_call` object - which includes `function.arguments`, the agent's own prompt text. A legitimate AskQuestion whose prompt quotes the synthetic-skip marker (e.g. an agent debugging this exact bug, or any prompt that pastes the marker verbatim) would have been rewritten as `no_input_surface` even when the operator actually answered. Changes: 1. `extractToolResult` now extracts the cursor-side response from function-shaped tool calls. Previously it returned `{}` for anything that wasn't `readToolCall` or `writeToolCall`. It now returns `function.result` when present, otherwise every field of `function` except `name` and `arguments`. This excludes the agent's input from what downstream sees as the tool result, and as a side effect surfaces the actual cursor response for function-shaped tools (which was previously lost - see the #784 incident note about HAPI storing `output: {}` for AskQuestion in the message DB). 2. `shouldRewriteAsNoInputSurface` now searches only the extracted `result`, not the whole `tool_call`. The bot's exact recommendation. 3. Test added: an AskQuestion whose `arguments` quote the marker but whose `result` is a real user answer, with elapsed time past the 500 ms threshold so the timing heuristic does not apply. Asserts the tool_result passes through with `status: 'completed'` and the operator's actual answer. All 847 cli tests pass (18 in `cursorEventConverter.test.ts`). `bun run typecheck` exits 0. The widened `extractToolResult` scope is necessary for the marker check to actually find the synthetic string (it lives inside `function.result` or a sibling field), and is the bot's explicit recommendation. It also removes the long-standing data-loss bug where AskQuestion responses were surfaced to the message DB as opaque `{}` - regardless of fabrication.
HAPI
Run official Claude Code / Codex / Gemini / OpenCode sessions locally and control them remotely through a Web / PWA / Telegram Mini App.
Why HAPI? HAPI is a local-first alternative to Happy. See Why Not Happy? for the key differences.
Features
- Seamless Handoff - Work locally, switch to remote when needed, switch back anytime. No context loss, no session restart.
- Native First - HAPI wraps your AI agent instead of replacing it. Same terminal, same experience, same muscle memory.
- AFK Without Stopping - Step away from your desk? Approve AI requests from your phone with one tap.
- Your AI, Your Choice - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor Agent, Gemini, OpenCode—different models, one unified workflow.
- Terminal Anywhere - Run commands from your phone or browser, directly connected to the working machine.
- Voice Control - Talk to your AI agent hands-free using the built-in voice assistant.
- Workspace Browser - Opt-in via one or more
hapi runner start --workspace-root <path>flags: browse scoped file trees from the web and start sessions in allowed subdirectories.
Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/38230353-94c6-4dbe-9c29-b2a2cc457546
Getting Started
npx @twsxtd/hapi hub --relay # start hub with E2E encrypted relay
npx @twsxtd/hapi # run claude code
hapi server remains supported as an alias.
The terminal will display a URL and QR code. Scan the QR code with your phone or open the URL to access.
The relay uses WireGuard + TLS for end-to-end encryption. Your data is encrypted from your device to your machine.
For self-hosted options (Cloudflare Tunnel, Tailscale), see Installation
Docs
Build from source
bun install
bun run build:single-exe
Credits
HAPI means "哈皮" a Chinese transliteration of Happy. Great credit to the original project.